Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 188 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked has 23% more |
| Protein | 29.88 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked has 22% more |
| Fat | 7.12 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked has 35% more |
| Sodium | 64 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 29% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked has 75% more |
| Iron | 2.88 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked has 540% more |
| Potassium | 346 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.