Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 186 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 22% more |
| Protein | 27.89 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 13% more |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 40% more |
| Sodium | 57 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 37% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 125% more |
| Iron | 1.74 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, flank, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 287% more |
| Potassium | 350 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.