CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
6 wins
| Nutrient | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 327 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 114% more |
| Protein | 4.78 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 81% more |
| Carbs | 40.95 g ★ | 0 g | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 0% more |
| Fat | 16 g | 5.28 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 203% more |
| Fiber | 2.2 g ★ | 0 g | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 0% more |
| Sugar | 4.82 g | 0 g ★ | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 0% more |
| Sodium | 463 mg | 90 mg ★ | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 414% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg ★ | 8 mg | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 138% more |
| Iron | 0.73 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | CRACKER BARREL, onion rings, thick-cut has 62% more |
| Potassium | 141 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 68% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.