Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled
5 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
4 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 154 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 152% more |
| Protein | 31.27 g ★ | 3.15 g | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 893% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.3 g ★ | 3.25 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 29% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 53 mg | 43 mg ★ | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 23% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 95% more |
| Iron | 4.56 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 15100% more |
| Potassium | 397 mg ★ | 132 mg | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 201% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.