Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 154 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 71% more |
| Protein | 31.27 g ★ | 2.01 g | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 1456% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 1433% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 53 mg | 36 mg ★ | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 47% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 4.56 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 561% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 397 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.