Emu, fan fillet, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, fan fillet, raw
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, fan fillet, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 103 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 14% more |
| Protein | 22.5 g ★ | 4.4 g | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 411% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.8 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 58% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 120 mg | 7 mg ★ | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 1614% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Iron | 4.5 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 202% more |
| Potassium | 300 mg ★ | 172 mg | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.