Emu, fan fillet, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, fan fillet, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, fan fillet, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 103 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 14% more |
| Protein | 22.5 g ★ | 2.01 g | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 1019% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 433% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 120 mg | 36 mg ★ | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 233% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Iron | 4.5 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 552% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 300 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.