Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 168 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 40% more |
| Protein | 33.67 g ★ | 4.4 g | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 665% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.68 g | 1.92 g ★ | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 40% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 110 mg | 7 mg ★ | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 1471% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 59% more |
| Iron | 6.89 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 362% more |
| Potassium | 324 mg ★ | 172 mg | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 88% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.