Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 168 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 87% more |
| Protein | 33.67 g ★ | 2.01 g | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 1575% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.68 g | 0.15 g ★ | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 1687% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 110 mg | 36 mg ★ | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 206% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 6.89 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Emu, full rump, cooked, broiled has 899% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 324 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.