Emu, ground, cooked, pan-broiled vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, ground, cooked, pan-broiled
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, ground, cooked, pan-broiled | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 163 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Emu, ground, cooked, pan-broiled has 36% more |
| Protein | 28.43 g ★ | 4.4 g | Emu, ground, cooked, pan-broiled has 546% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.65 g | 1.92 g ★ | Emu, ground, cooked, pan-broiled has 142% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 65 mg | 7 mg ★ | Emu, ground, cooked, pan-broiled has 829% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Iron | 5.01 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Emu, ground, cooked, pan-broiled has 236% more |
| Potassium | 375 mg ★ | 172 mg | Emu, ground, cooked, pan-broiled has 118% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.