Emu, inside drum, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, inside drum, raw
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, inside drum, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 108 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 10% more |
| Protein | 22.22 g ★ | 4.4 g | Emu, inside drum, raw has 405% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.49 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 22% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 102 mg | 7 mg ★ | Emu, inside drum, raw has 1357% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 76% more |
| Iron | 5.23 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Emu, inside drum, raw has 251% more |
| Potassium | 318 mg ★ | 172 mg | Emu, inside drum, raw has 85% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.