Emu, inside drums, cooked, broiled vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, inside drums, cooked, broiled
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, inside drums, cooked, broiled | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 156 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Emu, inside drums, cooked, broiled has 30% more |
| Protein | 32.38 g ★ | 4.4 g | Emu, inside drums, cooked, broiled has 636% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.01 g | 1.92 g ★ | Emu, inside drums, cooked, broiled has 5% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 118 mg | 7 mg ★ | Emu, inside drums, cooked, broiled has 1586% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 7.27 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Emu, inside drums, cooked, broiled has 388% more |
| Potassium | 312 mg ★ | 172 mg | Emu, inside drums, cooked, broiled has 81% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.