Fish, devilfish, meat (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, devilfish, meat (Alaska Native)
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, devilfish, meat (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
| Protein | 11.7 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, devilfish, meat (Alaska Native) has 166% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 5.3 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, devilfish, meat (Alaska Native) has 176% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Iron | 0.4 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 73% more |
| Vitamin C | 3 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, devilfish, meat (Alaska Native) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.