Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 76 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 37% more |
| Protein | 17.17 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw has 290% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.82 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 57% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 159 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw has 2171% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 29% more |
| Iron | 0.27 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Potassium | 331 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw has 92% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.