Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 76 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 16% more |
| Protein | 17.17 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw has 754% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.82 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw has 447% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 159 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, pollock, Alaska, raw has 342% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.27 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 331 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.