Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 15% more |
| Protein | 21.43 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 31% more |
| Fat | 5.5 g | 3.57 g ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 54% more |
| Sodium | 75 mg | 74 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 1% more |
| Calcium | 249 mg ★ | 15 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 1560% more |
| Iron | 0.7 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Potassium | 300 mg ★ | 256 mg | Fish, salmon, chum, canned, without salt, drained solids with bone has 17% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.