Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native)
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 266 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 61% more |
| Protein | 30.7 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 1% more |
| Fat | 15.9 g | 3.57 g ★ | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 345% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
| Calcium | 38 mg ★ | 15 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 153% more |
| Iron | 1.7 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Fish, salmon, king, chinook, kippered, canned (Alaska Native) has 63% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.