Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 135 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Protein | 24.21 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 450% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 82% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 54 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 671% more |
| Calcium | 51 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 200% more |
| Iron | 0.68 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 54% more |
| Potassium | 368 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 114% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.