Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 135 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 50% more |
| Protein | 24.21 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 1104% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 2233% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 54 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 50% more |
| Calcium | 51 mg ★ | 38 mg | Fish, scup, cooked, dry heat has 34% more |
| Iron | 0.68 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 1% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 368 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.