Fish, tilefish, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, tilefish, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, tilefish, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 147 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, tilefish, cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
| Protein | 24.49 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, tilefish, cooked, dry heat has 457% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.69 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, tilefish, cooked, dry heat has 144% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 59 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, tilefish, cooked, dry heat has 743% more |
| Calcium | 26 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, tilefish, cooked, dry heat has 53% more |
| Iron | 0.31 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 79% more |
| Potassium | 512 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, tilefish, cooked, dry heat has 198% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.