Fish, tuna, fresh, skipjack, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, tuna, fresh, skipjack, raw
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, tuna, fresh, skipjack, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 103 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 14% more |
| Protein | 22 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, tuna, fresh, skipjack, raw has 400% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.01 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 37 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, tuna, fresh, skipjack, raw has 429% more |
| Calcium | 29 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, tuna, fresh, skipjack, raw has 71% more |
| Iron | 1.25 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 16% more |
| Vitamin C | 1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, tuna, fresh, skipjack, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 407 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, tuna, fresh, skipjack, raw has 137% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.