Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 116 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 3% more |
| Protein | 25.51 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has 480% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.82 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 57% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 50 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has 614% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 1.53 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has 3% more |
| Potassium | 237 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, tuna, light, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has 38% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.