Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 132 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat has 10% more |
| Protein | 28.21 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat has 541% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.29 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 33% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 47 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat has 571% more |
| Calcium | 37 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat has 118% more |
| Iron | 1.6 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat has 7% more |
| Vitamin C | 1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat has 0% more |
| Potassium | 522 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, tuna, skipjack, fresh, cooked, dry heat has 203% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.