Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 128 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids has 7% more |
| Protein | 23.62 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids has 437% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.97 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids has 55% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 377 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids has 5286% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Iron | 0.97 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Potassium | 237 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, drained solids has 38% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.