Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids vs Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids
5 wins
🏆
Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 128 kcal | 61 kcal ★ | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has 110% more |
| Protein | 23.62 g ★ | 3.15 g | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has 650% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 4.8 g ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.97 g ★ | 3.25 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 9% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 5.05 g | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 100% more |
| Sodium | 50 mg | 43 mg ★ | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has 16% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 113 mg ★ | Milk, whole, 3.25% milkfat, with added vitamin D has 88% more |
| Iron | 0.97 mg ★ | 0.03 mg | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has 3133% more |
| Potassium | 237 mg ★ | 132 mg | Fish, tuna, white, canned in water, without salt, drained solids has 80% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.