Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 188 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 14% more |
| Protein | 30.66 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 1% more |
| Fat | 6.32 g | 3.57 g ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 77% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg | 74 mg ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 11% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg ★ | 15 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 60% more |
| Iron | 3.05 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 193% more |
| Vitamin C | 9 mg ★ | 0 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 0% more |
| Potassium | 459 mg ★ | 256 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 79% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.