Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted
6 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
2 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 188 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 23% more |
| Protein | 30.66 g ★ | 24.58 g | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 25% more |
| Fat | 6.32 g | 5.28 g ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 20% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 9% more |
| Calcium | 24 mg ★ | 8 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 200% more |
| Iron | 3.05 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 578% more |
| Vitamin C | 9 mg ★ | 0 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 0% more |
| Potassium | 459 mg ★ | 439 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, cooked, roasted has 5% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.