Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw
5 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 13% more |
| Protein | 23.3 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 25% more |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 3.57 g ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 34% more |
| Sodium | 78 mg | 74 mg ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 5% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg ★ | 15 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 20% more |
| Iron | 2.32 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 123% more |
| Vitamin C | 7 mg ★ | 0 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 436 mg ★ | 256 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 70% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.