Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw
6 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
2 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 143 kcal ★ | 147 kcal | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 3% more |
| Protein | 23.3 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 23% more |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 2.08 g ★ | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 131% more |
| Sodium | 78 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 21% more |
| Calcium | 18 mg ★ | 9 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 100% more |
| Iron | 2.32 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 227% more |
| Vitamin C | 7 mg ★ | 0 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 0% more |
| Potassium | 436 mg ★ | 249 mg | Game meat, beefalo, composite of cuts, raw has 75% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.