Java-plum, (jambolan), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Java-plum, (jambolan), raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Java-plum, (jambolan), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 60 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 33% more |
| Protein | 0.72 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Carbs | 15.56 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
| Fat | 0.23 g | 0.15 g ★ | Java-plum, (jambolan), raw has 53% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 14 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Iron | 0.19 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Vitamin C | 14.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Potassium | 79 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 83% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.