Lamb, Australian, ground, 85% lean / 15% fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Lamb, Australian, ground, 85% lean / 15% fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Lamb, Australian, ground, 85% lean / 15% fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 255 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Lamb, Australian, ground, 85% lean / 15% fat, raw has 113% more |
| Protein | 17.14 g ★ | 4.4 g | Lamb, Australian, ground, 85% lean / 15% fat, raw has 290% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 20.71 g | 1.92 g ★ | Lamb, Australian, ground, 85% lean / 15% fat, raw has 979% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 77 mg | 7 mg ★ | Lamb, Australian, ground, 85% lean / 15% fat, raw has 1000% more |
| Calcium | 9 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 47% more |
| Iron | 1.41 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 5% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.