SILK Chocolate, soymilk vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK Chocolate, soymilk
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | SILK Chocolate, soymilk | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 58 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 52% more |
| Protein | 2.06 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Carbs | 9.47 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 56% more |
| Fat | 1.44 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 25% more |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 71% more |
| Sugar | 7.82 g | 0.87 g ★ | SILK Chocolate, soymilk has 799% more |
| Sodium | 41 mg | 7 mg ★ | SILK Chocolate, soymilk has 486% more |
| Calcium | 123 mg ★ | 17 mg | SILK Chocolate, soymilk has 624% more |
| Iron | 0.59 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 60% more |
| Potassium | 144 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 16% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.