Babyfood, prunes, without vitamin c, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, prunes, without vitamin c, strained
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, prunes, without vitamin c, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Babyfood, prunes, without vitamin c, strained has 11% more |
| Protein | 1 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 50% more |
| Carbs | 23.52 g ★ | 20.71 g | Babyfood, prunes, without vitamin c, strained has 14% more |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.15 g ★ | Babyfood, prunes, without vitamin c, strained has 33% more |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 18% more |
| Sugar | 14.28 g | 6.48 g ★ | Babyfood, prunes, without vitamin c, strained has 120% more |
| Sodium | 1 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Calcium | 21 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
| Iron | 0.4 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.3 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Potassium | 306 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.