Beef, New Zealand, imported, bolar blade, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, bolar blade, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast roasted
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, bolar blade, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 228 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, bolar blade, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast roasted has 38% more |
| Protein | 31.3 g ★ | 31.02 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, bolar blade, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast roasted has 1% more |
| Fat | 11.37 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, bolar blade, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast roasted has 218% more |
| Sodium | 33 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 55% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 60% more |
| Iron | 2.54 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, bolar blade, separable lean and fat, cooked, fast roasted has 144% more |
| Potassium | 177 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.