Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 252 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised has 53% more |
| Protein | 29.92 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 4% more |
| Fat | 14.74 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised has 313% more |
| Sodium | 37 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 50% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Iron | 2.52 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised has 142% more |
| Potassium | 183 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 29% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.