Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 252 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised has 65% more |
| Protein | 29.92 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised has 22% more |
| Fat | 14.74 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised has 179% more |
| Sodium | 37 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 59% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 2.52 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, cooked, braised has 460% more |
| Potassium | 183 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 58% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.