Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 181 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 10% more |
| Protein | 19.38 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 38% more |
| Fat | 11.45 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 221% more |
| Sodium | 53 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 28% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 60% more |
| Iron | 1.89 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 82% more |
| Potassium | 295 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 15% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.