Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 181 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 18% more |
| Protein | 19.38 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
| Fat | 11.45 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 117% more |
| Sodium | 53 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 41% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 25% more |
| Iron | 1.89 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean and fat, raw has 320% more |
| Potassium | 295 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.