Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 26% more |
| Protein | 32.08 g ★ | 31.02 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 3% more |
| Fat | 8.89 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 149% more |
| Sodium | 38 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 49% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 60% more |
| Iron | 2.71 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 161% more |
| Potassium | 189 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 26% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.