Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 208 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 36% more |
| Protein | 32.08 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 31% more |
| Fat | 8.89 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 68% more |
| Sodium | 38 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 58% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 25% more |
| Iron | 2.71 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, cooked, braised has 502% more |
| Potassium | 189 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.