Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 131 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 21% more |
| Protein | 20.46 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 34% more |
| Fat | 5.41 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw has 52% more |
| Sodium | 56 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 24% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 73% more |
| Iron | 2.04 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw has 96% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.