Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 131 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 14% more |
| Protein | 20.46 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 17% more |
| Fat | 5.41 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw has 2% more |
| Sodium | 56 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 38% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 50% more |
| Iron | 2.04 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, chuck eye roll, separable lean only, raw has 353% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.