Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 602 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 293% more |
| Protein | 6.97 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 72% more |
| Carbs | 0.01 g ★ | 0 g | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 63.78 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 1108% more |
| Sodium | 32 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 64% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 38% more |
| Iron | 0.76 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, intermuscular fat, raw has 69% more |
| Potassium | 143 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 67% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.