Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 731 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 343% more |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 79% more |
| Fat | 78.3 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 2093% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 66% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 15 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 13% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 55% more |
| Potassium | 129 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.