Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 731 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 378% more |
| Protein | 6.5 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 74% more |
| Fat | 78.3 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 1383% more |
| Sodium | 25 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 72% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 113% more |
| Iron | 0.47 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, cooked has 4% more |
| Potassium | 129 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 71% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.