Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 685 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 315% more |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 73% more |
| Fat | 72.38 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 1927% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 65% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg ★ | 15 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 33% more |
| Iron | 0.38 mg | 1.04 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 63% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 256 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.