Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 685 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 348% more |
| Protein | 8.5 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 65% more |
| Fat | 72.38 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 1271% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 71% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, New Zealand, imported, subcutaneous fat, raw has 150% more |
| Iron | 0.38 mg | 0.45 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 16% more |
| Potassium | 93 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 79% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.