Celtuce, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Celtuce, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Celtuce, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 18 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
| Protein | 0.85 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Carbs | 3.65 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Celtuce, raw has 100% more |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 48% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 11 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
| Calcium | 39 mg ★ | 38 mg | Celtuce, raw has 3% more |
| Iron | 0.55 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
| Vitamin C | 19.5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 1% more |
| Potassium | 330 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.