Chewing gum, sugarless vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Chewing gum, sugarless
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Chewing gum, sugarless | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 268 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Chewing gum, sugarless has 198% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 94.8 g ★ | 20.71 g | Chewing gum, sugarless has 358% more |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.15 g ★ | Chewing gum, sugarless has 167% more |
| Fiber | 2.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Calcium | 20 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 47% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.