Feijoa, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Feijoa, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Feijoa, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 61 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
| Protein | 0.71 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 65% more |
| Carbs | 15.21 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 27% more |
| Fat | 0.42 g | 0.15 g ★ | Feijoa, raw has 180% more |
| Fiber | 6.4 g ★ | 3.3 g | Feijoa, raw has 94% more |
| Sugar | 8.2 g | 6.48 g ★ | Feijoa, raw has 27% more |
| Sodium | 3 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Calcium | 17 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 55% more |
| Iron | 0.14 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
| Vitamin C | 32.9 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Feijoa, raw has 68% more |
| Potassium | 172 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.